Market This

It is my job to interact with every other sector of the company to ensure that everything is running smoothly, on schedule, and that each sector is running in compliance of the other sectors. This has meant that I have been organising and attending meetings with different areas of the company to both check their progress and discuss and set goals. While running the company and creating our piece is very much a collaborative process, many of the artistic decisions are being run by me to check before a final decision is made. This is particularly prominent in marketing.

The marketing process has been an exciting one. I am aware that many producers would not find having to “re-design” their logo only one week after its release date due to a consensus that the original was inappropriate for our company’s image would not be an exciting moment. However, I feel it gave us a chance to listen to the public’s feedback on our initial design and to merge their criticisms with our idea’s to create a logo that we are very proud of. This was a point where I was glad to have worked with the marketing team, as well as the director and the production manager to come up with the first design, as it meant that we were all in agreement that none of us had foreseen this image being an issue. Making the executive decision to release our first logo design may not have been the best decision, but I believe that the way the company dealt with the repercussions of perhaps “hurried” release made us think a lot longer and harder about what is going to be best for the company from then on in. In fact we soon turned this mistake into a marketing opportunity in itself, as a “new logo launch” gave us good publicity on our social media sites. Kirsty and Jess dealt with the re-launch very professionally and quickly got onto creating our next publicity tool, our teaser trailer, which has received a lot of positive attention on Facebook and Twitter.

New logo promo

Since then I have met with Kirsty and Jess twice to discuss the next steps for the company’s marketing campaign. This week we wrote and edited a press release for the LPAC brochure, as well as the press release for the public in general. These are being checked by the LPACs marketing team at a later point this week.

On top of this I have been on contact with the LPACs managing director, Craig Morrow, and Front of House Manager, Holly Cox, about putting on an acoustic night as part of our marketing campaign.

Email to Craig

Having received the all clear from Craig, I arranged a meeting with Holly to discuss logistics for the event and we are now waiting to hear the possible dates for our acoustic event.

 

Admin

Having been producer of Hand Me Down Theatre for just over a month now, I thought it was time to share some of my experiences with the role so far.
The first, simple task that I have been dealing with is booking rehearsal space. While having the LPAC at our disposal has made this a significantly easier and cheaper feat than it would be if I were to be booking space in a separate venue, it is a task that has required a lot of coordination. This is because being a cast of 9 very busy people, we do not all run from the same time table. Finding a time that is suitable for us all was therefore the first “challenge” that I came across. However, until we break up for Easter, we managed to secure Wednesday 1-3pm as our rehearsal slot, though a lot of the rehearsals in this time have had to take place in the main admin building of the university.

Below is an image of the company’s rehearsal time table for after Easter. I hope to add more dates to this in the coming weeks to ensure that the company meets at least three times a week in the fortnight before the show. This timetable is no inclusive of production meetings, which do not normally require studio space.

Rehearsal Timetable #2

In order for this time table to work effectively, I have had to coordinate other members of the company to book sets times and spaces on my behalf. This is because under the LSPA studio bookings policy each individual is not allowed to book more than two hours in a studio per day. I have therefore employed the help of a number of company members to book studio space according to my planned timetable.

As well as booking space, our finance manager and I have been in discussion over our overall budget. Below is a representation of the allocated budget as it was originally forecast. However, following a meeting with Dominic and further discussions, this has now changed. The money we have allocated money to ‘copy right’, for example, has now been spread out over marketing and costume/props sectors, as we no longer foresee that we will need to buy any performance rights. This is because while our piece is made up of other people’s words, we are using so little of each speech, or changing it enough for it to be considered “fair use” under the copy right laws.

Budget Graph

Graph by Kayleigh Brewster

The reason behind the reallocation of certain areas of our budget is that realistically the initial budget covered all of the areas of the production that we thought might require money. Having reviewed our current production ideas we can now see that some of the areas will require far less money, if any at all. This reallocation of funds has benefited departments such as marketing significantly. This is beneficial to the company as a whole, as this is our first performance as a company, and we are aware that because we are not an established name on the theatre scene, and we do not have a dedicated following, that we will need to have a strong marketing campaign to get a good audience for out debut piece.

Marilyn’s Success

Until yesterday a lot of our meetings have involved discussions about our ideas, but very little practical devising. One of the first decisions we made in our devising process was that we were going to use various forms of text, such as speeches, monologues, lyrics and poems and re-contextualise them. Our first task therefore was to individually seek out texts that we could use as stimuli in our workshops.

Unsurprisingly a lot of the texts that we bought in had linking themes. Ideas such as power, beauty, and dreams came up a number of times, and when analysed outside of their original context, a lot of these texts had underlying themes of feminism, though only a few of us had actively sought to bring that topic in for discussion.

Though we have work shopped one other idea before, based on Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech, the result of that session was a scene that we do not see ourselves using in our performance, though some of the elements of it may find there way into the final piece at some point.

The result of Fridays session however, was much more promising. The workshop involved us playing with one of Marilyn Monroe’s speeches about natural beauty. We have been playing with the idea of adding a multi-media element to this particular scene, while exploring a feministic take on the opinion Marilyn was expressing on beauty and sexuality in society. While I do not want to divulge too much information on the scene itself so as not to give too much away before the performance, I am excited to say that that workshop has set the ball rolling for what we hope will be a very exciting piece of work.

2014-02-21 10.57.12

Image taken by Lizzy Hayes, 2014

 

Producer

From the first company meeting it became apparent that each member of our company has experienced successful and enjoyable devised work, created using a collaborative workshop process, and we were all keen to continue in that vein.

We were all aware however that these previous projects had many differences to the project our company was about to embark on. Previous projects were often smaller, and involved fewer people, meaning that only three or four people had to make the artistic decisions, not eight or nine. It soon became clear therefore that in order for us to create a good, strong company that could produce art of a good quality we would need to allocate jobs to each member of the company. This by no means renders us a company under a dictatorship, but instead that the ideas that we come up with as a collective can be filtered through a hierarchy of decision makers.

Having stated near the beginning of our process that I was interested in looking into how the theatre company would be run from “back stage”, and all of the admin and rights involved it seemed appropriate that I should be allocated as producer of Hand Me Down Theatre.

From day one the experience has already been a massive learning curve. I have never individually produced a whole show before, though thinking about it, I have helped in producing many of the shows or pieces I have been involved with in the past…I just wasn’t aware at the time that the jobs I was doing came under the title of “producing”.
One of the first things I did once allocated as the producer was borrow “So You Want To Be A Theatre Producer?” by James Seabright. The contents page alone opened my eyes to the wide range of responsibilites that I am taking on, but the prospect of learning about these areas of the theatre in more depth actually quite excited me. Bring on the next three months I say!